<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ASP.NET 2.0 dumb&#039;s down request validation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phed.org/2008/01/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phed.org/2008/01/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/</link>
	<description>the rantings of michael eddington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:56:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramesh Raja</title>
		<link>http://phed.org/2008/01/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramesh Raja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phed.org/2008/04/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[please guide to get VB.NET &amp; ASP.NET Dump&#039;s questions &amp; answers

thank u]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please guide to get VB.NET &amp; ASP.NET Dump&#8217;s questions &amp; answers</p>
<p>thank u</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramesh Raja</title>
		<link>http://phed.org/2008/01/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramesh Raja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phed.org/2008/04/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[please guide to get VB.NET &amp; ASP.NET Dump&#039;s questions &amp; answers

thank u]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please guide to get VB.NET &amp; ASP.NET Dump&#8217;s questions &amp; answers</p>
<p>thank u</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASP.NET 2.0 dumbâ€™s down request validation &#171; Kartik Trivedi</title>
		<link>http://phed.org/2008/01/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ASP.NET 2.0 dumbâ€™s down request validation &#171; Kartik Trivedi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phed.org/2008/04/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] phed.org Â» ASP.NET 2.0 dumbâ€™s down request validation    &#160; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] phed.org Â» ASP.NET 2.0 dumbâ€™s down request validation    &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASP.NET 2.0 dumbâ€™s down request validation &#171; Kartik Trivedi</title>
		<link>http://phed.org/2008/01/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ASP.NET 2.0 dumbâ€™s down request validation &#171; Kartik Trivedi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phed.org/2008/04/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] phed.org Â» ASP.NET 2.0 dumbâ€™s down request validation    &#160; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] phed.org Â» ASP.NET 2.0 dumbâ€™s down request validation    &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASP.NET 2.0&#8217;s Dumbed Down Request Validation May Actually Improve Security &#171; omg.wtf.bbq.</title>
		<link>http://phed.org/2008/01/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ASP.NET 2.0&#8217;s Dumbed Down Request Validation May Actually Improve Security &#171; omg.wtf.bbq.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phed.org/2008/04/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] caught up with Michael Eddington&#8217;s short and sweet analysis of the request validation in ASP.NET 2.0. So far I&#8217;ve seen a few people blast it, but I think [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] caught up with Michael Eddington&#8217;s short and sweet analysis of the request validation in ASP.NET 2.0. So far I&#8217;ve seen a few people blast it, but I think [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASP.NET 2.0&#8217;s Dumbed Down Request Validation May Actually Improve Security &#171; omg.wtf.bbq.</title>
		<link>http://phed.org/2008/01/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ASP.NET 2.0&#8217;s Dumbed Down Request Validation May Actually Improve Security &#171; omg.wtf.bbq.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phed.org/2008/04/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] caught up with Michael Eddington&#8217;s short and sweet analysis of the request validation in ASP.NET 2.0. So far I&#8217;ve seen a few people blast it, but I think [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] caught up with Michael Eddington&#8217;s short and sweet analysis of the request validation in ASP.NET 2.0. So far I&#8217;ve seen a few people blast it, but I think [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafal Los</title>
		<link>http://phed.org/2008/01/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafal Los]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phed.org/2008/04/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well - this really means that Microsoft is putting the security aspects of application development back in the hands of developers.  Although this breaks the uniformity principle (the more standardized, the safer) ... it&#039;s forcing developers to actually know what they&#039;re doing... sort of.

Look for more vulns in .Net 2.0 code, coming to a web app near you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8211; this really means that Microsoft is putting the security aspects of application development back in the hands of developers.  Although this breaks the uniformity principle (the more standardized, the safer) &#8230; it&#8217;s forcing developers to actually know what they&#8217;re doing&#8230; sort of.</p>
<p>Look for more vulns in .Net 2.0 code, coming to a web app near you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafal Los</title>
		<link>http://phed.org/2008/01/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafal Los]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phed.org/2008/04/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well - this really means that Microsoft is putting the security aspects of application development back in the hands of developers.  Although this breaks the uniformity principle (the more standardized, the safer) ... it&#039;s forcing developers to actually know what they&#039;re doing... sort of.

Look for more vulns in .Net 2.0 code, coming to a web app near you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8211; this really means that Microsoft is putting the security aspects of application development back in the hands of developers.  Although this breaks the uniformity principle (the more standardized, the safer) &#8230; it&#8217;s forcing developers to actually know what they&#8217;re doing&#8230; sort of.</p>
<p>Look for more vulns in .Net 2.0 code, coming to a web app near you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calculated Decision &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ASP.NET 2.0 Worse Off Against XSS Than ASP.NET 1.1</title>
		<link>http://phed.org/2008/01/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calculated Decision &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ASP.NET 2.0 Worse Off Against XSS Than ASP.NET 1.1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phed.org/2008/04/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Eddington recently posted some interesting information regarding the differences in request validation being used in ASP.NET 1.1 vs. ASP.NET 2.0.Â  In addition to the information he&#039;s posting, which are good things to know, I think this should [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eddington recently posted some interesting information regarding the differences in request validation being used in ASP.NET 1.1 vs. ASP.NET 2.0.Â  In addition to the information he&#8217;s posting, which are good things to know, I think this should [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calculated Decision &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ASP.NET 2.0 Worse Off Against XSS Than ASP.NET 1.1</title>
		<link>http://phed.org/2008/01/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calculated Decision &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ASP.NET 2.0 Worse Off Against XSS Than ASP.NET 1.1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phed.org/2008/04/23/aspnet-20-dumbs-down-request-validation/#comment-78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Eddington recently posted some interesting information regarding the differences in request validation being used in ASP.NET 1.1 vs. ASP.NET 2.0.Â  In addition to the information he&#039;s posting, which are good things to know, I think this should [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eddington recently posted some interesting information regarding the differences in request validation being used in ASP.NET 1.1 vs. ASP.NET 2.0.Â  In addition to the information he&#8217;s posting, which are good things to know, I think this should [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

